HOME > Á¦Ç°°¶·¯¸®
Á¦ ¸ñ supporters, the eligibility
ÀÌ ¸§ Gal3Gher
The 2010s will also be ±¸Âî=±¸Âî¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù
remembered for the decade-long saga of Caster Semenya, a story that continues to divide opinion in sport like little else. In 2019, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) ruled ¸íǰ·¹Çø®Ä«»çÀÌÆ®=¸íǰ·¹Çø®Ä«»çÀÌÆ®
in favour of a hugely controversial IAAF rule that forced the South African runner - and other athletes with differences in sexual development (DSD) - to take hormone-limiting drugs if she wanted to compete in the middle-distance events she had dominated for years. After a long legal battle, Semenya pulled out of the World Championships. For Semenya's supporters, the eligibility regulation was an appalling breach of human rights and a ³ÃÁ¤¼ö±â·»Å»=¿õÁøÄÚ¿þÀÌ ³ÃÁ¤¼ö±â·»Å» Á¦ºù±â°â¿ë ½Ç¹ö / CPI-6500LÃÖ°í
discriminatory act of sexism and racism designed to target her. For others, it was a necessary and proportionate step to protect women's sport and fair competition. But whatever one's perspective, there is no doubt that the debate has confronted sport with uncomfortable questions ¿äÁö¾ß¸¶¸ðÅä=¿äÁö¾ß¸¶¸ðÅä¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù
around gender identity and human biology, the suitability of sport's traditional male and female categories, È«Äá¸íǰ³²¼º°¡¹æ=È«Äá¸íǰ³²¼º°¡¹æ È«Äá¸íǰ¿©¼º°¡¹æ È«Äá¸íǰ³²¼ºÁö°©
the reliability of the medical science on which the IAAF's rule relies, perceptions of womanhood and sport's complex relationship with the law.
( 2020-01-01 18:10:02 Á¶È¸:989 )
»ç¹«±â±â·»Å» ÀÌÅ¿ø°Ç¹°¸Å¸Å
Á¤¼ö±â·»Å» Æ÷ÀåÀÌ»ç ³Ã¿ÂÁ¤¼ö±â Àϼö
Á¤¼ö±â ¿©ÀÚ·¹Çø®Ä« ´ë±¸·ù¸¶Æ¼½º
°¡µæÇÏ °í, °¡³­ÇÑ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÇÏ·çÇÏ·ç°¡ ¾î·Æ°Ô À̾îÁø..
°³Àε· Á¤¼ö±â ¿õÁø°ø±âûÁ¤±â·»Å»
·¹Çø®Ä« °³Àε· Á¤¼ö±â·»Å»
´À´Ô°ú Á¶»ó¿¡°Ô µµ¿òÀ» ûÇÏ´Â ¸¶À½ÀÌ »ý±â¸é
¹Ù¶÷À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Ù. ºÀÀÌ ±è¼±´Þ¡¯À̶ó´Â ±â»ç°¡
·ù¸¶Æ¼½º À½½Ä¹°Ã³¸®±â·»Å» ¿ë´ÞÀÌ»ç
¸íǰ·¹Çø®Ä«Ãßõ ÄíÄíÁ¤¼ö±â·»Å»
ÇØ¿Ü¼±¹° ³²¼º·¹Çø®Ä« ´ë¿©°èÁÂ
´ë±¸·ù¸¶Æ¼½º ÇØ¿Ü¼±¹°´ë¿©°èÁÂ
´ë¿©°èÁ ·¹Çø®Ä«¼îÇθô Á¤¼ö±â·»Å»
¾óÀ½Á¤¼ö±â·»Å» ÀÌÅ¿øºÎµ¿»ê
À§´Ï¾Æ°ø±âûÁ¤±â ´ë¿©°èÁ ½Ä±â¼¼Ã´±â
  391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400